Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTaskin O.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:36:49Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:36:49Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1936-6426
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-011-0341-6
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/4579
dc.description.abstractThis qualitative research aims at first defining how pre-service science teachers think regarding the theory of evolution (TOE) with a particular hands-on and minds-on activity (The article by O'Brien (Am Biol Teach 62(8):578-582, 2000) entitled A toilet paper timeline of evolution: 5 E cycle on the concept of scale is modified and applied in the present research as an intervention process.) Finally, specific suggestions in instructional techniques are offered based on a geological time scale. At the end of intervention, the research follows how participants respond to what they found out or came across. If participants had common misconceptions regarding the TOE, these are revealed. The present research was conducted in two spring semesters of 2009 and 2010 in a geology course. The participant number of the study was 129. The research lasted three weeks. Research results showed that participants were generally misinformed regarding conceptual knowledge of the TOE. Approximately half of the participants did not believe (the term believing in or acceptance of the TOE does not affect research findings) in the TOE. Mostly, they thought that there is no place for human evolution in Islam. Few of them could reconcile scientific information with their own Islamic point of view. Even though they did not believe in the TOE, most of them accepted that they did not have adequate knowledge regarding the TOE. They mostly said they were shocked about the first appearance of human beings in the geological time scale, which is the main issue in the present research. After intervention, conceptual change was considerable, though this is a secondary concern. The results also show that even though students were quite prejudiced regarding the TOE, they were ready to explore it deeply. Such concrete activities might be helpful to push students to think over the TOE. However, there are numerous barriers such as ill-prepared science textbooks and websites, unwillingness of instructors, and official policy of the Ministry of National Education. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipParticipant [55] associated the TOE with Marxism and Leninism–even with socialism. The same participant also supports the censorship regarding Darwin’s article in popular science magazine Science and Technology which is funded by an official government science academy (Abott 2009). The participant follows up saying “Darwinism is a perverted idea which has been supported by the atheists that is why I do not believe in the TOE… I am really confused…Hope, I do more search [to learn regarding the TOE]. But where are the transition forms? After 150 years, why is the TOE still theory not a law? Still I am not satisfied. Still, I should ask many questions… I liked the activity. It is everlasting activity (easily-remembered). I would like to use this activity in my class.” Participant [55] is neither politically nor scientifically correct and reveals common misconceptions and epistemological problems. Meanwhile, it appears that the participant is strongly religiously opinioned. According to the participant, a particular circle of members (pro-evolutionists) have imposed the ideas of Darwin on society. A common epistemological problem regarding the definition of theory is also another finding which can be supported by previously conducted studies in Turkey (Taskin and et al. 2008). The participant also looks for transitional forms for the proof of the TOE; however these transitional forms are defined as freaks, such as fish with wings, an organism with an elephant trunk. Participant [56] similarly says that “I would like to believe in the TOE however I cannot see it.” It is not surprising to find these examples because readers mostly use misinformed internet websites such as Harun Yahya’s.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Central Ltd.en_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s12052-011-0341-6en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConceptual changeen_US
dc.subjectFossil recorden_US
dc.subjectGeological time scaleen_US
dc.subjectMisconceptionen_US
dc.subjectTeaching evolutionen_US
dc.titleCan Willingness and Hands-on Work Together? Teaching Biological Evolution and Dealing with Barriersen_US
dc.typereviewen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume4en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage467en_US
dc.identifier.endpage477en_US
dc.relation.journalEvolution: Education and Outreachen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record