Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGunbey H.P.
dc.contributor.authorSayit A.T.
dc.contributor.authorIdilman I.S.
dc.contributor.authorAksoy O.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:37:24Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:37:24Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn1757-790X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-202522
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/4738
dc.description.abstractIntrauterine devices (IUDs) are one of the most reliable and cheapest contraception methods. Our aims are to evaluate misplaced IUDs with radiological findings and to emphasise the importance of radiological imaging. We report two cases with radiological findings, one of complete migration to the abdomen without colonic perforation and one of partial migration to the bladder lumen with pregnancy. Uterine perforation and migration of IUDs are rare and undesirable complications. Suspected intra-abdominal IUDs can be evaluated with CT for precise localisation and possible complications without pregnancy. Copyright 2014 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1136/bcr-2013-202522en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleMigration of intrauterine devices with radiological findings: Report on two casesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.relation.journalBMJ Case Reportsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record