Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorUzun O.
dc.contributor.authorTopuz O.
dc.contributor.authorYalpi F.
dc.contributor.authorUnsal F.
dc.contributor.authorAydin C.
dc.contributor.authorBodrumlu E.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:42:05Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:42:05Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.issn1305-7456
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.120641
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/4930
dc.description.abstractObjective: We aimed here to evaluate the enlargement characteristics of two nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems that use two different preparation techniques, in simulated root canals under "operator-related variables" standardized conditions. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 simulated canals in resin blocks were divided into two groups as the Mtwo group for use with a single-length technique and the ProTaper instrument system group for use with crown down technique. To standardize the operator-related variables, all preparations were carried out with a computer controlled device that was developed and used previously as described in a published study. The pre- and post-operative digital images of the canals were superimposed and measured at 11 levels from the apical tip. The distances between the pre- and post-operative outer lines of the root canals were measured at both the inner and outer sides of the curve. The amount of removed material and the symmetry of the preparations were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann-Whitney test. Results: Significantly more material was removed by Mtwo at 9 levels and by ProTaper at 2 levels (P < 0.05) while no significant difference was determined at 11 levels. The preparations made with ProTaper were more symmetrical at 4 levels while no significant difference was determined at 7 levels. Conclusion: Mtwo removed significantly more material than ProTaper at different levels of the curved root canals. Mtwo and ProTaper made symmetrical preparations and maintained the original shape of the root canal at different levels under controlled operator-related variables. © 2013 Dental Investigations Society.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.4103/1305-7456.120641en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectMtwoen_US
dc.subjectPreparation symmetryen_US
dc.subjectProtaperen_US
dc.subjectResin blocksen_US
dc.subjectRotary instrumentationen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of two rotary instrumentation techniques under "operator-related variables" standardized conditionsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage395en_US
dc.identifier.endpage398en_US
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record