Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKokcu A.
dc.contributor.authorKurtoglu E.
dc.contributor.authorCelik H.
dc.contributor.authorKefeli M.
dc.contributor.authorTosun M.
dc.contributor.authorOnal M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T09:43:08Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T09:43:08Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1513-7368
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.13.5331
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/5264
dc.descriptionPubMed: 26225674en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to compare the tumor-free and overall survival rates between patients with low-risk endometrial cancer who underwent surgical staging and those who did not undergo surgical staging. Materials and Methods: Data, including demographic characteristics, grade of the tumor, myometrial invasion, cervical involvement, peritoneal washing, lymph node involvement, lymphovascular space invasion, postoperative complication, adjuvant treatment, cancer recurrence, and tumor-free and overall survival rates, for patients with low-risk endometrioid endometrial cancer who were treated surgically with and without pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection (LND) were analyzed retrospectively. The patients diagnosed with endometrioid endometrial cancer including the following criteria were considered low-risk: 1) a grade 1 (G1) or grade 2 (G2) endometrioid histology; 2) myometrial invasion of <50% upon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 3) no stromal glandular or stromal invasion upon MRI; and 4) no evidence of intra-abdominal metastasis. Then the patients at low-risk were divided into two groups; group 1 (n=117): patients treated surgically with pelvic and paraaortic LND and group 2 (n=170): patients treated surgically without pelvic and paraaortic LND. Results: There was no statistical significance when the groups were compared in terms of lymphovascular space invasion, cervical involvement, positive cytology, and recurrence, whereas the administration of an adjuvant therapy was higher in group 2 (p<0.005). The number of patients with positive pelvic nodes and the number of metastatic pelvic nodes were significantly higher in the group with positive LVI than in the group without LVI (p<0.005). No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of tumor-free survival (p=0.981) and overall survival (p=0.166). Conclusions: Total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and stage-adapted postoperative adjuvant therapy without pelvic and/or paraaortic lymphadenectomy may be safe and efficient treatments for low-risk endometrial cancer.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAsian Pacific Organization for Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.13.5331en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndometrial canceren_US
dc.subjectLow-risk, lymphovascular space invasionen_US
dc.subjectPelvic-paraaortic lymphadenectomyen_US
dc.titleIs surgical staging necessary for patients with low-risk endometrial cancer? A retrospective clinical analysisen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.issue13en_US
dc.identifier.startpage5331en_US
dc.identifier.endpage5335en_US
dc.relation.journalAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Preventionen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster