• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Total vaginal reconstruction with combined 'Split Labia Minora Flaps' and full-thickness skin grafts

Date

2007

Author

Baytekin, Caghan
Menderes, Adnan
Mola, Fahri
Balik, Ozan
Tayfur, Volkan
Vayvada, Haluk

Metadata

Show full item record

Abstract

Purpose: Vaginal reconstruction with split-thickness skin grafts is the most common method for total vaginal reconstruction. Although it has disadvantages like contraction of the graft, foreshortening, donor site morbidity and long-lasting periods of vaginal standing; its easy surgical technique makes it popular. A new method using split labia minora (LM) flaps and full-thickness skin graft is discussed in this study. Method: A 19-year-old female was presented with amenorrhea. A total absence of vagina was present and the patient underwent a total vaginal reconstruction for possible sexual intercourse. Results: We observed no contraction and no foreshortening with a patent vaginal cavity up to 11 cm and 4.5 cm width. The need for continuous standing period was as short as 4 weeks and for intermittent standing up to 4 months. Sexual intercourse was encouraged after 4 weeks. During sexual intercourse no external lubrication was reported to be needed. There was no need for further reconstructive intervention. Conclusion: Vaginal reconstruction in congenital vaginal agenesis with split LM flaps and full-thickness skin grafts is a simple and effective method, which shortens the standing period and decreases the contraction in neovagina. Total vaginal reconstruction with split LM flaps could also be possible; to achieve this goal, expansion of LM flaps could be a further alternative.

Source

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research

Volume

33

Issue

4

URI

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00575.x
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/19854

Collections

  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [6144]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [14046]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [12971]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Policy | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs

by OpenAIRE

Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Policy || Library || Ondokuz University || OAI-PMH ||

Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
Ondokuz University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@Ondokuz Mayıs:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.