Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Seda
dc.contributor.authorOzden, Bora
dc.contributor.authorBas, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorAltun, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorAltunkaynak, Berrin Zuhal
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-21T13:28:07Z
dc.date.available2020-06-21T13:28:07Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1049-2275
dc.identifier.issn1536-3732
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003236
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12712/12895
dc.descriptionBAS, BURCU/0000-0003-0593-3400en_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000392299200023en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 27977491en_US
dc.description.abstractThe ideal graft material for maxillary sinus augmentation is still a matter of controversy and the search for a more appropriate bone substitute for use continues. The aim of this study was to evaluate bone formation as a sign of the regeneration following maxillary sinus augmentation in rabbits using 3 different biomaterials, one of which is a newly developed graft material; calcified triglyceride bone cement (CTBC). Twenty-one New Zealand rabbits were used and randomly divided into 3 groups. Bilateral maxillary sinus augmentation was carried out and autogenous bone (AB), bovine hydroxyapatite (BHA), and CTBC were administered. Maxillary sinuses were dissected after fourth and eighth weeks of the operation. The bone formation was evaluated by stereological and histopathological analysis and the data were analyzed statistically. When the volume of primary bone is compared, statistically significant differences were found among all groups at both of the fourth and eighth weeks. The highest value was obtained from AB applied group. In BHA and CTBC applied groups, active bone formation, osseointegration of graft materials were observed at both fourth and eighth weeks. In CTBC applied group, primary bone formation was only seen as linked to the continuation of parent sinus bony wall. The efficiency of primary bone formation of CTBC was found less than AB and BHA. Of the 3 graft materials tested, BHA is the strongest alternative to AB graft for maxillary sinus augmentation.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)Turkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Arastirma Kurumu (TUBITAK) [111S026]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was supported by grant of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project Number: 111S026).en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1097/SCS.0000000000003236en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAutogenous boneen_US
dc.subjectbovine hydroxyapatiteen_US
dc.subjectcalcified triglyceride bone cementen_US
dc.subjectmaxillary sinus augmentationen_US
dc.subjectstereological studyen_US
dc.titleCould Calcified Triglyceride Bone Cement Be an Alternative Graft Material in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation?en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentOMÜen_US
dc.identifier.volume28en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage97en_US
dc.identifier.endpage103en_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Craniofacial Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster